Mod California Living

AWSAL910 (January 9th, 2009 @ 1:29 am)

it's the 90's? idk what i'm talking about i was born in the 90's.

AWSAL910 (January 9th, 2009 @ 1:27 am)

i kinda want to know what the crowd would have done if he brought out the 2008 Macbook?

CentauriAB (January 8th, 2009 @ 11:21 am)

hahaha 300mhz.

cbowdelacerda (January 8th, 2009 @ 12:23 am)

I like how they freaked out over the handle.

honskilled (January 7th, 2009 @ 6:56 am)

ahh no. i think this was a sweet computer back then.

knaveutube (January 7th, 2009 @ 5:32 am)

did u expect them to have 3 GHZ 10 years ago? cause it sounds like thats what ur implying.

monkeyboy2264 (January 6th, 2009 @ 11:30 pm)

hahaha fastest graphics ever!

benrules77 (January 4th, 2009 @ 5:20 am)

yea i know i hate the colors.

mani1239 (January 3rd, 2009 @ 8:22 am)

I remember wishing I had this computer because I saw Carrie Bradshaw had it in Sex and the City and Reese Witherspoon had it in Legally Blonde! haha Now I have the newest MacBook :)

AkiraFollower (January 3rd, 2009 @ 7:00 am)

God the colors are so girly and gay like the old imac

TalesOfWar (January 2nd, 2009 @ 11:35 pm)

Battery technology hasn't improved as much as processor or hard drive tech. Much larger hard drives need to spin faster to be of decent performance and the CPU's these days run at far far FAR higher speeds, so use more power. The FSB on the newer CPU's are faster than the actual clock speed on the ones you'd find back then.

TalesOfWar (January 2nd, 2009 @ 11:26 pm)

Not neccesarily. The smaller process CPU's require less power to run at the same speed, example being the 65 and 45nm CPU's from Intel. A 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo running on 65nm will use more power than a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo running on 45nm. The 45nm it'll run faster too because of higher front side bus and larger cache.